-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implementation of the table element #6
Comments
A few notes here:
|
A few additional notes:
|
mortenpi
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 5, 2022
mortenpi
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2022
These are helper functions for working with tables that try to work around some of the complexity the current element structure brings (see also #6).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The precise implementation of the Table element in CommonMark is currently unclear to me (not sure how the different sub-elements should be organized).
TableBody
andTableHeader
elements altogether, and just interpret the first row as the header.TableCell
a singleton, removing its fields. They could also be turned into some sort of dynamic properties that are determined by traversing the tree.TableComponent
subtypeAbstractElement
directly and don't use it forTable
(to ensure that the internal nodes of a table are not allowed to exists in other contexts).rows
,nrows
,ncols
etc. to dynamically determine the number of columns and rows of a table.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: