Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Hi @xdxxxdx, Decoupling the ingest from the fragmentation is intended behavior. We persist these in the database so a large gap won't cause memory issues and we will get eventual consistency. However I do agree that the gap is quite big in your case and took the liberty to look into your ldes-server.yml. You did not activate auto-index-creation. I assume you aren't managing your indices manually either. This property has a very big impact on the performance of the fragmentation. Can you try adding the following property to your yml?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello.
I am using the low water quality observations data set for testing 1.4.0 snapshot
Full setup please see: https://github.com/xdxxxdx/ODALA_demonstrator
232738 water quality members are ingested.
In the real-time: 22574 members are processed for the fragmentations.
The gap is quite big for me, but don't know if there is an efficiency matrix set for evaluating the project.
Therefore, I make this case for future discussion.
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions