-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
boost 1.84 #159169
boost 1.84 #159169
Conversation
Shall I close #158705 then? |
Sorry, I missed #158705, my bad :(. Your's did not have the "long build" label, and as I did not see boost 1.84 in the long builds, I did not check for it in the other pull requests. I can push my changes to your pull request if you want, or we can close your's, as you wish. |
Is it normal if every builds fails that it still tests the dependents? |
The python failure makes no sense since it seems to be using C++14 on our side. |
I have a bunch of patches ready, will push as soon as I made significant progress, as not to pollute the long build queue too early. |
b815cf4
to
69bbe2b
Compare
HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>
(after doingHOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>
)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>
?