Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can CHIPS support CSV in partition keys for RWS? #179

Open
anushshukla opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Can CHIPS support CSV in partition keys for RWS? #179

anushshukla opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@anushshukla
Copy link
Contributor

Let's take an actual example of our live environment to explain the problem statement and solution.

https://vwo.com and https://wingify.com are part of the same RWS while https://dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com is a third-party script loaded on these 2 websites that can create third-party cookies as CHIPS.

We would like to have the ability to add comma-separated values as the partition keys if these domains are part of RWS so that these CHIPS-based cookies can be shared across different domains if they're part of the same RWS.

We look forward to your response!

@anushshukla anushshukla changed the title Comma separated partition key query / proposal CHIPS support for comma separated partition key Dec 18, 2023
@cfredric
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @anushshukla,

Thanks for filing! It looks like one of your colleagues brought this up to us already in WICG/first-party-sets#94, but this is a tricky problem that we haven't found a great solution for yet.

@anushshukla anushshukla changed the title CHIPS support for comma separated partition key Comma separated partition key support in CHIPS Dec 19, 2023
@anushshukla anushshukla changed the title Comma separated partition key support in CHIPS Can CHIPS support CSV in partition keys for RWS? Dec 20, 2023
@bitbi064

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants