Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility with PIM 3.1 or 3.2 #207

Open
userz58 opened this issue May 29, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Compatibility with PIM 3.1 or 3.2 #207

userz58 opened this issue May 29, 2019 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@userz58
Copy link

userz58 commented May 29, 2019

Will compatibility be supported with versions 3.1 and 3.2 ?

@Olaf1989
Copy link

Olaf1989 commented Jul 8, 2019

Currently we are using the latest CustomEntityBundle version (3.0.0) with Akeneo 3.1.11 and we only had to change one line of code from the CustomEntityBundle (because of the structure changes). Everything seems to work as far as i have tested.

/Controller/AjaxOptionController.php in the use statement
From:
use Pim\Component\ReferenceData\Repository\ReferenceDataRepositoryInterface;

To:
use Akeneo\Pim\Enrichment\Component\Product\Repository\ReferenceDataRepositoryInterface;

@lynchwu2002
Copy link

Good to know 3.1 works. But what about 3.2?

@Rafelder
Copy link

Good to know 3.1 works. But what about 3.2?

It seems to also work in 3.2 with the change from @Olaf1989. I have not tested it extensively, but at first glance everything seems to work.

@tcmax76
Copy link

tcmax76 commented Apr 15, 2020

Anyone know if there are any different steps for installing on Akeneo 3.2 other than the one referenced by @Olaf1989 above? I'm not having much luck getting it to show up in our Akeneo after following the steps.

@jmleroux jmleroux removed their assignment Apr 16, 2020
@jmleroux jmleroux added this to the v3.x milestone Apr 16, 2020
@Olaf1989
Copy link

Good to know 3.1 works. But what about 3.2?

Works also with 3.2 for us

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants