Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential Revival of this Codebase #147

Open
Jacob-Steele opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

Potential Revival of this Codebase #147

Jacob-Steele opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@Jacob-Steele
Copy link

Is it at all possible to revive this codebase so a new release can be done or ownership can be passed on to people who will continue to maintain it?

A new release would be great to fix the slowness of tests that fixes #109 implemented

I'd like to look into potentially adding support for Java 17, as well as fix some issues like #143 so we can bump the Jenkins versions up in our tests.

Let me know if I can do anything to help kick this process off.

Thanks,

@deblaci
Copy link

deblaci commented Jun 29, 2023

Yes it is would be nice, we are waiting for the next release since #109 fixed, we had to release it to own maven repo, but community development would be better.
We have also a stub class what implements some
Jenkins pipeline functionality(env vars, params, retry impl.) what can be incorporated to this project.

Or Are there any fork of this what actively developed?

@Jacob-Steele
Copy link
Author

@deblaci I may wait a bit to see if any response comes in from the original authors.

If nothing comes around, I'll try and see if I can get it forked somewhere to add some more contributions to.

@balza
Copy link

balza commented Feb 28, 2024

@Jacob-Steele have you forked the project? If so I like give an hand.

@Jacob-Steele
Copy link
Author

@balza No I haven't had a chance to fork this repo and attempt to revive it.

One of the reasons I wanted to attempt to revive this was due to my organization using this project to do heavy lifting in tests related to Jenkins. We were able to commit time to looking at forking and improving this repo. Unfortunately, priorities changed for my org to shift away from focusing on Jenkins to other CI/CD platforms and caused this to fall off our radar.

If anything does come of being forked on this project, I can help contribute towards it, I just don't have the personal time right now to be a key contributor in it.

@slmjy
Copy link

slmjy commented Apr 8, 2024

My org will also be interested in contributing

@balza
Copy link

balza commented May 20, 2024

@awittha do you have any suggestion??

@SaranshIam
Copy link

+1 We would like to contribute in maintaining this.

@Gengar003
Copy link

Gengar003 commented Sep 10, 2024

Hi, I am @awittha, however, I have left ExpediaGroup and no longer have access to the @awittha account so I can't prove that (nor manage this repository any longer). I also no longer have access to, nor use, Jenkins, so my ability to contribute meaningfully to the codebase is gone for now.

I would recommend forking the repository and all collaborating in the new one, in something not tied to a corporate employee's account... unless some other ExpediaGroup employee happens along to handle the revitalization of the codebase in this repository! (IMO, unlikely....)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants