Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate numerical field types #34

Open
jthreefoot-edb opened this issue May 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Evaluate numerical field types #34

jthreefoot-edb opened this issue May 18, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@jthreefoot-edb
Copy link
Contributor

The schema has mostly tried to make sure the REST API output has accurate types instead of making every field a string like the output of barman diagnose. However, some are still strings instead of number or integer, such as max_replication_slots, max_wal_senders, and wal_keep_size (there may be others I've missed). Double check if these being strings is intentional or an oversight, and if necessary fix accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant