Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Give the wand item some special metadata #2328

Closed
Secret-chest opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Give the wand item some special metadata #2328

Secret-chest opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
status:invalid This does not describe a request or bug with WorldEdit type:feature-request Request for something new

Comments

@Secret-chest
Copy link

The Problem

tl;dr: make the wand you get by doing //wand special.

I believe I'm not the only one who enjoys the convenience of having WorldEdit on the same instance as used to play suvival (cheated survival) normally. It's not ideal, not at all.

By default the wand is a wooden axe. That of course interferes much with survival. I changed it to the creative-only item I find most useless: the command-block-minecart. Still, the ideal way would be to make wands only obtainable through their respective commands.

A Solution

Give some metadata to the items obtained through wand commands, to indicate that they are indeed wands. A regular item of the same type as the wand will no longer work. Basically, make it work similarly to brushes.

Alternatives

Set the wand to a creative-only item. However, this is not ideal as you still lose access to said item.

Anything Else?

No response

@Secret-chest Secret-chest added status:pending Pending acceptance or closure. type:feature-request Request for something new labels May 31, 2023
@wizjany
Copy link
Collaborator

wizjany commented May 31, 2023

duplicates #1306 / #1589

@wizjany wizjany closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 31, 2023
@wizjany wizjany added status:invalid This does not describe a request or bug with WorldEdit and removed status:pending Pending acceptance or closure. labels May 31, 2023
@Secret-chest
Copy link
Author

duplicates #1306 / #1589

No, it's not.

@octylFractal
Copy link
Member

The changes to support this would be the same as those issues. It is effectively a duplicate.

@EngineHub EngineHub locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 31, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
status:invalid This does not describe a request or bug with WorldEdit type:feature-request Request for something new
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants