Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Allow multiple BGS Manager Roles for the non-admin commands #52

Open
Admiralfeb opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@Admiralfeb
Copy link

Hi,
We use the bot in our server.

I'm wondering if it would be possible to adjust the BGSRole to be able to assign multiple roles to it so we don't have to have one over-arching role for it?
I see that BGSAdmin can be assigned to multiple roles, why not the BGS Manager/Role?

@SayakMukhopadhyay
Copy link
Member

Well, to make it short, its very difficult to make this change now since the DB is designed to handle a single role for the BGSRole. It was designed to restrict permissions to execute BGS commands like adding a monitored system/faction and the idea was that a certain person or a group of people would be allowed to do that. What I could do is create a new role called the UserRole or something similar and give it access to generate reports at the minimum.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants