-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Question] SWEET's subclasses for Landform are very mixed #235
Labels
Comments
lewismc
added
the
esipwinter2021
Work which will feature at the ESIP Winter 2021 meeting
label
Jan 20, 2021
Lewis,
These 2 issues are related but use different examples of things that need
to be resolved.
Potomac, MD
240-426-0770
…On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:49 PM Lewis John McGibbney < ***@***.***> wrote:
@Garybc <https://github.com/Garybc> is this a duplication of #234
<#234> ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#235 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACIMQIVH25TJ5WXZSMLYJJ3S24JRBANCNFSM4WFS3YZA>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Landscape and landcover are not usually thought of as subclasses of landform, but are classed as such in SWEET.
https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/SWEET/?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fsweetontology.net%2FrealmLandOrographic%2FOrographic
Perhaps even more confusing is listing "orographic" and "non orographic:" as subclasses.
https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/SWEET/?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fsweetontology.net%2FrealmLandform%2FLandscape&jump_to_nav=true#visualization
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: