Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do you need 3D annotation points to train your GAN? #12

Open
JasOlean opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Do you need 3D annotation points to train your GAN? #12

JasOlean opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@JasOlean
Copy link

I read your paper in details.
So, for training you said you do not need 3D annotation set to train your GAN.
In here, I have an unclear point.
You trained Human3.6M dataset in your GAN without 3D annotation data. And then estimate z component. After your estimation, there are estimated 3D pose.
My question is how to compare your estimated 3D pose and ground truth 3D pose?
For comparison, do we need 3D annotation data? Because I have not 3D pose for my interest field (i.e not human pose).
To compare the experimental results, I think I will require 3D pose. Is it right?
Thank your for your reading.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant