You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to see a more abstract representation of the system on which we are running CStar.
I'm not sure exactly what form this should take, but I think the scientific configuration should be specified as separately as possible from the specifics of the HPC system.
One idea in this direction is to have a class to represent the "runtime" or "executor", which is passed to the case.run() method, and contains all information about the machine. However if we also need to use machine-specific arguments during compilation then I guess we have to pass the machine information in earlier too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to see a more abstract representation of the system on which we are running CStar.
I'm not sure exactly what form this should take, but I think the scientific configuration should be specified as separately as possible from the specifics of the HPC system.
One idea in this direction is to have a class to represent the "runtime" or "executor", which is passed to the
case.run()
method, and contains all information about the machine. However if we also need to use machine-specific arguments during compilation then I guess we have to pass the machine information in earlier too.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: