Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Comments on Provider JSON #5

Open
aviars opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Comments on Provider JSON #5

aviars opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@aviars
Copy link

aviars commented Apr 9, 2015

  • The use of the terms "FACILITY" is eronous as NPI's are Type I and Type-2 according to the NPI final rule.. Often a Type-II does correspond to a facility but not always. For this reason, I reccomend using the codes "NPI-1" and "NPI-2", but use Individual, Facility, and Organization as suitable lables.
  • Since there is only one address, it should be qualified as to what kind. It should be in the documentation and code it as PRACTICE-LOCATION. Consider leaving address off altogether for individuals but leave it on the TYPE/FACILITY ertiries.
  • Type-IIs needs a name section I use the field name "organization_name".
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@aviars