You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The process time for RDRSv2.1 is inefficient as it takes nearly 3 hours for any domain. This could be much more efficient and be done in a few minutes for any spatial/temporal domain of interest.
Solutions that come to mind:
first subsetting needs to be done and then the modifications on the lon value take place,
spatial subsetting to be done using ncks index values, rather than cdo's sellonlatbox method.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
one makes sense, I thought datatool was designed this way (first subsetting of variables and then subsetting of the domain).
for the second, I believe we looked into that but decided to continue with cdo, if the decision is to go back to the index, I would suggest having the index search in a fully separate function so WRF and all the other datasets also use the same function and are easier to control. Complications can arise from the order of lat, lon, etc ( I believe the reason why we stayed with cdo).
I would also rename the issue to a more general task possibility of subsetting for domain based on index. This is general and not RDRS specific in my point of view.
Given the fact that the efficiency is mentioned here, I would like to turn this back to @sujata91 on the efficiency of MESH model in reading the input files as well. I believe this is communicated well with MESH team but no solid action is performed.
Reported by: Sujata Budhathoki @sujata91
The process time for
RDRSv2.1
is inefficient as it takes nearly 3 hours for any domain. This could be much more efficient and be done in a few minutes for any spatial/temporal domain of interest.Solutions that come to mind:
lon
value take place,ncks
index values, rather thancdo
'ssellonlatbox
method.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: