Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sharpness based registration/autotracking #18

Open
cpoczatek opened this issue Jun 23, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Sharpness based registration/autotracking #18

cpoczatek opened this issue Jun 23, 2016 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cpoczatek
Copy link
Member

Right now both Autotrack and the Center of mass Autotrack script register the image based on minimizing some value, mean squared error over pixel values and movement of the center of mass of pixel values respectively. Neither of these directly measure "sharpness" (for some definition of sharpness) which is really what's desired. Low count images are particularly difficult.

It might be possible to do a "best guess" of the set of translations (with either Autotrack or CoM) and then do some kind of annealing or directed random search to find better (=sharper) near by translations. Possible algorithms: simulated annealing or Nelder-Mead simplex search.

Need to define "sharpness" numerically.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants