Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Carya ovata (Mill.) K. Koch #51

Open
TonyMundell opened this issue Sep 24, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Carya ovata (Mill.) K. Koch #51

TonyMundell opened this issue Sep 24, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
accepted Confirms that the change should be applied to MapMate at the next opportunity.

Comments

@TonyMundell
Copy link

I found this in VC12, 31 Oct 2015, Alice Holt SU7978 4300 single tree in Forestry Commision plantation, det. Matt Parratt.
It is included on the DDB but I want to record it on my MapMate database.
There is a discrepancy with the authority given as (Poir.) Spach on the DDB yet as (Mill.) K. Koch on theplantlist.
@sacrevert
Copy link
Collaborator

sacrevert commented Sep 24, 2018 •
edited
Loading

The FNA also goes with (Mill.) K.Koch http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=233500320
I would go with this given that the Plant List agrees. (Poir.) Spach seems to be due to some possible taxonomic confusion/link with Pterocarya fraxinifolia
(possibly due to the fact that the name C. ovata var. fraxinifolia also exists, or more in-depth links through typification that we are not going to solve here.)

@japonicus
Copy link
Member

Thanks, I've updated the DDb entry to (Mill.) K.Koch.

@japonicus japonicus added the accepted Confirms that the change should be applied to MapMate at the next opportunity. label Sep 10, 2024
@japonicus
Copy link
Member

Tagged for MapMate inclusion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
accepted Confirms that the change should be applied to MapMate at the next opportunity.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@japonicus @sacrevert @TonyMundell