Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Extractor incorrectly adds new endpoints to all revisions #462

Closed
koregan42 opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

[BUG] Extractor incorrectly adds new endpoints to all revisions #462

koregan42 opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@koregan42
Copy link

Release version

4.10.2

Describe the bug

When extracting an API which has multiple revisions, in order to add a new endpoint, the endpoint is extracted into both revisions.

Expected behavior

The endpoint should only be extracted into the revision where the change was made

Actual behavior

When adding a new Health endpoint to Revision 2, the Health endpoint was also added to revision 1.

Reproduction Steps

Add a new endpoint to Revision 2 of an API, and then run the extractor. Notice that the endpoint is also added to Revision 1.

Copy link

  Thank you for opening this issue! Please be patient while we will look into it and get back to you as this is an open source project. In the meantime make sure you take a look at the [closed issues](https://github.com/Azure/apiops/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed) in case your question has already been answered. Don't forget to provide any additional information if needed (e.g. scrubbed logs, detailed feature requests,etc.).
  Whenever it's feasible, please don't hesitate to send a Pull Request (PR) our way. We'd greatly appreciate it, and we'll gladly assess and incorporate your changes.

@waelkdouh waelkdouh added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 18, 2024
@waelkdouh
Copy link
Contributor

@simonTTIS - revisions aren't working properly in ApiOps. Our next major release will fix this.

@waelkdouh
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of #184.

@waelkdouh waelkdouh closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants