Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gernsheim Corpus #177

Open
spykoulouris opened this issue Apr 9, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Gernsheim Corpus #177

spykoulouris opened this issue Apr 9, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@spykoulouris
Copy link

Is there a way to reconcile the Gernsheim Corpus data across institutions?

@AndreasMichelakis AndreasMichelakis transferred this issue from ArtResearch/artresearch.net Apr 12, 2021
@lklic
Copy link

lklic commented Apr 28, 2021

we were supposed to have specifications on this from the various providers, especially the Frick and Hertziana

@MinadakisNikos
Copy link
Contributor

So its time to finish this work. I am adding here info found from my notes and emails to move forward:

  1. The identifiers for Frick Gernsheim records all exist in the 590 9 field.
    Both the 590 9 |b and the 590 9 |k will have the word "Gernsheim" and the corpus number is the 590 9 |c field.
    One caveat about the corpus number is the spacing may not be consistent.
    Some 5 digit or 6 digit numbers may have a space after the third digit from the right.
    So 98765 could be entered as 98 765 or 100234 could be entered as 100 234.

  2. Hertziana: The Gernsheim ID is in our field a8470 within the photo-description. From what I saw a8515 has the abbrevation. So by using all of this we can map them and match them.

  3. List from Frick with the Gernsheim techniques and abbreviations: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J_8rSWavfB0SZ8rcIzWghQHdOZPExc30/edit#gid=163094790

@mafragias
Copy link
Contributor

Frick example of mapping Gernsheim :

    <https://pharos.artresearch.net/resource/frick/work/.b10125826/production>
            a       <http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E12_Production> ;
            <http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P01i_is_domain_of>
                    <https://pharos.artresearch.net/resource/frick/carried_out_by/.b10125826/Rottenhammer%2C%20Hans%2C> ;
            <http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P33_used_specific_technique>
                    <https://pharos.artresearch.net/resource/frick/vocabulary/technique/1E56149F-8FD9-3091-8746-3F944BE20C65>,
                    <https://pharos.artresearch.net/resource/gernsheim/br-w> , <https://pharos.artresearch.net/resource/gernsheim/br> .

Hertziana Example of gernsheim mapping :

    <https://pharos.artresearch.net/resource/hertziana/photo/bh_gern_182521_post/production>
            a       <http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/E12_Production> ;
            <http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/P33_used_specific_technique>
                    <https://pharos.artresearch.net/resource/gernsheim/g-sc> .

Let me know if there is anything more that can be done for this before the next data update

mafragias added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2021
@mafragias mafragias added the validation needs validation before closing label May 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants