[ECP-9154][ECP-9491] Excessive network usage while making a virtual purchase

[embolden]

Describe the bug
When placing an order for a virtual product adyen.js makes ~100 calls to each of dfp.1.0.0.html, fingerprintjs2.js, and risk.1.0.0.js. This transfers 2.8MB over the network. Purchasing a physical product makes ~6 calls on the same environment.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Assuming a clean Magento 2 installation with only the Adyen plugin installed and a sample virtual product.

1. Add virtual product to cart
2. Go to checkout
3. Observe network tab

Expected behavior
I would expect that 1 call would be sufficient for these.

Magento version
2.4.6-p4

Plugin version
9.3.0

Screenshots
Sorry for the resolution - Github limits to 10MB.
https://github.com/Adyen/adyen-magento2/assets/1679978/0a04b624-5149-45c8-90c6-7adaadbc84a7

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: MacOS Sonoma 14.1.1 (23B81)
• Browser: Chrome
• Version: 123.0.6312.107

[candemiralp]

Hello @embolden,

Thank you for raising this issue. We've created an internal investigation ticket.

Best regards,
Can

[candemiralp]

Hello @embolden,

We've successfully reproduced this issue. But considering the current priorities, we won't be able to provide a fix soon. However, as a temporary solution, you can disable risk data collection which triggers all of those calls.

Please add the following line to these configuration parameters.

risk: {
    enabled: false
}

You will be informed once we find an elegant solution to this issue.

Best regards,
Can

[JamelleG]

Hello @candemiralp,

We are also experiencing the same issue. While we know there is a temporary workaround by disabling the risk data collection, do you have any updates on when a permanent fix might be available?

Especially given that Adyen v8 support/maintenance ends in January 2025 (https://github.com/Adyen/adyen-magento2?tab=readme-ov-file#support--maintenance).

[candemiralp]

Hello @embolden & @JamelleG,

Thank you for your patience. We have introduced a POC to this issue and are looking forward for some pilot tests. Could you please share your insights on the PR #2770?

Best Regards,
Can